Seeing is Believing?:

By -
Unfortunately while I did not have access to Eck’s book on Darsan, I also have had experience in a number of classes learning about divine visualization and its potential for activating religious experiences. In a number of South Asian focused courses, such as Peoples and Cultures of the Himalaya I have had the chance to interact with both the Buddhist and Hindu practice of visualization and it has always captured my attention. Now in this course, it assumes a very different focus as rather than honing in on the regional and ethnic characteristics of the practice, I am taking a peek into the sensory dimension of the act which would seem the most obvious. This practice also interests me from a science vs. religion perspective, what is the appropriate way to categorize and understand a practice like this?

We as people and culture, simultaneously put both a lot of stake and almost none into the act of seeing something in order to believe it. The act of seeing must first be believable to be believed but it also must first be seen to be believable to some degree. A lot of people require some sort of backing evidence such as scientific testing or video before they will believe that what someone saw or experienced is real. There are neuroscientific understandings of the visualization
practice but I find them rather unsatisfactory and they always just seem to be ways of diminishing the acts of others. What is the best way to combine and interface Western perspectives with the acts of other cultures?

Comments

  1. Oskar MattesMay 8, 2020 at 8:22 PM

    I'm really interested to see how cultural relationship between vision and veracity changes as time goes on. With the prevalence of Photoshop, deep fakes, cgi, and many more technologies, the bond between the two is already starting to be broken. I'm wondering how long it will take before we rely on our eyes to tell the truth only as much as we do our noses or hands.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jonathan Brumberg-KrausMay 11, 2020 at 1:19 PM

    Robin Wall Kimmerer's Braiding Sweetgrass does a really nice job of "comb[ing] and interfac[ing] Western perspectives with the acts of other cultures," namely biological science and Native American perspectives on our interactions with plants, animals, and ecosystems in general.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The most primitive sense

By -
Image
Smell the Flowers by Kirsten Star Smell, to me, is the most primitive sense. When most mammals are born, they immediately can recognize their mother’s smell and form an attachment to that smell. Mammals like puppies are almost entirely limited to only the sense of smell until they develop more of their other senses. The sense of smell also becomes the most primitive when considering humans and the phenomenon of perfume. For years, humans hunted certain animals for the purpose of obtaining the musk produced in the anal gland. This musk in small doses can act as an aphrodisiac when put into a perfume even though it has incredibly primitive origins. Though most of Western culture has an aversion to smells considered gross or undesirable, the wealthiest of women are still willing to pay heavy prices to spray a smell once obtained from the anal glands of other animals. The sense of smell is not something that humans can control and adjust but rather it is only changed by evolution over
Read more

Cannibalism and Symbolism

By -
Symbolism plays an important role in religious ceremonies because people cannot have the divine being where they want him all the time. So they start creating ways to be in touch with God. Such as in Christianity, eating bread is symbolized to be eating God-made flesh. There are similar rituals in Judaism where they eat the food of God. A big difference between taste and the other senses is that the object that is being sensed is internalized, whereas all the other senses use an external sensation. Taste cannot extend anywhere like the other senses can. This allows the humans to have no barrier between the divine (symbolized as food) and themselves. This is the closest they can get to God, but internalizing Him.  This thought of getting the closest they can to someone by ingesting and gaining power from it led my mind to wander to the thought of serial killers that also happen to be cannibals. I know that it might be a stretch, but there are some similarities. I als
Read more

Wrap-Up Post

By -
Image
Alright, let’s tie this up in a nice little bow. I genuinely did not know what to expect coming into this class. The extent of my knowledge of the senses comes from elementary school when we had to make it a little song to get the information through our tiny heads. Beyond that, everything seemed pretty cut and dry. We have five senses. We need to use all of them to survive. It’s as simple as that. I did not know how there was enough to talk about the senses to fill an entire college course, especially one specifically regarding the relationship between the senses and religion. But the fact that we were barely able to fit all the content in before the semester ended proves just how wrong I was. Let’s talk about why that is and what some of the things I learned were. First off, even the most basic assumption about the senses, that there are five of them, was questioned immediately. The sixth sense may not have been as clearly defined as the other senses, but there was certainly a lot to
Read more