Understanding the deities of Hinduism

By Anonymous -


After our class on Thursday I felt that I did not grasp the concept of Hinduism and its deities. After a fair bit of online reading I came to realize that there are several basic principles: karma, reincarnation, dharma, and all pervasive divinity. Karma is the idea that good intentions and good deeds contribute to good karma and future happiness, while bad intentions and bad deeds contribute to bad karma and future suffering. Reincarnation is the idea that the body may die but the soul is transferred or reborn, into another body until it is let out of the circle of death and rebirth and transcends.  Pervasive divinity was defined in the video A Short introduction to Hinduism posted by BhahavadGita: “All worship the one all-pervasive supreme being…God is unmanifest, unchanging and transcendent; the self-god: timeless, formless and spacelss . As pure consciousness, god is the manifest primal substance of pure love and light; flowing through all form, existing everywhere time and space as infinite intelligence and power. As primal soul, god is our personal lord, source of all three worlds, our Father-mother-god, who protects nurtures and guides us. We beseech god’s grace in our life by knowing he/she is the essence of our soul, the life of our life.” This is the idea of Bhraman. All of the other deities are different manifestations and parts of this ultimate deity.  


The explanation that allowed me to best understand this idea was written by Prof. Jeaneane Fowler of the University of Wales College, Newport in her book Hinduism: Beliefs, Practices and Scriptures.  “The relationship between the many manifest deities and the unmanifest Brahman is rather like that between the sun and its rays. We cannot experience the sun itself but we can experience its rays and the qualities, which those rays have. And, although the sun’s rays are many, ultimately, there is only one source, one sun. So the Gods and Goddesses of Hinduism amount to thousands, all representing the many aspects of Brahman”. It is near impossible to worship something that has no definition, no description, nor qualities. However, each of the other deities represents a different aspect of this unknowable god. These gods then provide worshipers with a concept and a focus for Brahman. This explains why darsan is so important to the worshiper. It is one thing to see a symbol or host for the manifestation of the ultimate “god”, but another idea entirely that the ultimate being might see and know you in every way. I can imagine the intensity of that kind of experience: to be seen and known, entirely and completely.

Comments

  1. Jonathan Brumberg-KrausApril 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM

    I wonder if in some ways being seen by a god through darsan is psychologically equivalent to what a Christian might mean and feel in the expression "Jesus loves you." It's what I thought of when you described darsan as "that the ultimate being might see and know you in every way ... to be seen and known, entirely and completely." The ubiquity of visual images in Hinduism suggests at first sight the idea: seeing is believing, but it seems more than that to me. It's not so much _belief_ that requires a concrete visible object as _devotion_. How can you love, show love to something, someone that is not visible or concrete? Is love (which I'm using synonymously with "devotion") that is kept to oneself and not physically, visibly, or otherwise sensually_shown_ to another really love at all? How would anyone know they are loved unless it was somehow shared with them? Maybe this is a place where a "sixth sense" might come in, since I suppose we do sometimes feel loved without seeing any "external" evidence for it. But for most of our practical experiences of love for others (lovers, parents, children, friends, etc.) we show it through shared meals; giving flowers (and other gifts); hugs, kisses, holding hands, etc.; exchanged glances, exchanged words; making pictures for; dressing; bathing; visits and calls - not so different from the acts of puja to visible Hindu deities. Also, are the emotions evoked by pictures, recordings, letters, things belonging to a loved one a love for those things themselves or for the loved one whose they are? Is there love, connection with others without concrete acts of love, acts of devotion? I'm inclined to say no

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Amidst the Pandemic

By -
Image
I think having the opportunity to take Smells and Bells and then experiencing a worldwide pandemic came with good timing. Oftentimes, we’re so rushed to get from one one place to another that we miss out on what happens around us. We’re so accustomed to the lifestyle of being busy that it has become the norm for many of us. However, the pandemic has forced us to slow down. We’re now appreciating everything that we had previously taken for granted and noticing things in our surroundings that we have never noticed before.  Take this quarantining/social distancing as an opportunity to be more aware of what you experience through the senses. I don’t think my senses have necessarily heightened over the past 5 weeks, but I am actively making the choice to pay more attention to what I see, hear, touch, taste, and smell. I like going on nature/mindfulness walks and basking in the sunshine out in my backyard. This morning, I could hear a faint noise from the wind, hear the birds chirpin...
Read more

Food in the Afterlife

By -
Image
In Religion in the Kitchen: Cooking, Talking, and the Making of Black Atlantic Traditions , Perez talks of Ashabi and her grandchildren providing food offerings to their ancestors. This immediately reminded me of the practice of food sacrifice in early China. I've taken Chinese language classes for about 7 years now and in one of the lessons, we learned about food as well as the history of food in Chinese culture. Ashabi and her grandchildren would give food offerings to their ancestors every day. This included nine beverages (coffee, liquor, and water mixed with sugar and molasses) and nine square pieces of coconut topped with red palm oil and guinea pepper. The offerings would also include whatever food was dropped on the ground. In their house, food dropping on the floor signified more than it would in common American households. It signified that the ancestors wanted that food and had willingly made it fall to the floor. They also used dishware that had been chipped which was...
Read more