'Sacred Performance'

By -

The term is an oxymoron. Sacrality implies (at least in the salvation religions dominant in Western and Near Eastern history), a meaning rooted in a cosmic frame that transcends any immediate sensed from. The sacred cannot, therefore, be “performed.” Any reduction of meaning to form deprives that form of meaning. To perform the “sacred” necessarily is to profane it. Yet the sacred becomes real only as embodied in form. (1990, 208)

This quote from Peacock in chapter three, page 119, of Rasmussen's book really intrigued me. It's sort of a different take than what I recently read in Exploring Judaism: A Reconstructionist Approach by Rebecca Alpert and Jacob Staub. There's an entire chapter on Mordechai Kaplan's transnaturalist perspective that I was reminded of in this section. Kaplan's view was more so that God is found in the process, "God works through us rather than upon us" (Exploring Judaism, 20). I can't exactly remember if the phrase 'God as a process' came from Rabbi Alex Weissman, but I remember learning something similar in one of his Adult Education classes. 

I, personally, really like this view of God, so reading that you can't 'perform the sacred' is not necessarily something I agree with. Applying Kaplan's transnaturalism, wouldn't you feel God the most when you are performing something? Everyday life, in some ways, is its own sort of performance.  If God is omniscient, why isn't making a meal, playing music, or beautifully reciting the word of God not a performance to include God into your everyday life/space/home? 

This also reminds me of a discussion we had as a class last semester in JBK's Intro to the Hebrew Bible class. I think it was about God's instructions to build the Mishkan, which then developed into whether or not we thought art could be a tool of religion. If you use art (writing, music, painting, etc) as a method to get closer to the divine, then I wouldn't classify that as 'profane.' Maybe it's because I'm an artist myself, but there's a beauty and sense of fulfillment from the process of creation. If creating religious art is the best way for you to work through your feelings around God, then do it. Art is a multifunctional, multimedia experience that can encompass every emotion, every sense, every way to experience. Isn't that what God is meant to feel like? The sacred can, in my opinion, be performed. There are ways to find sacrality in the making, and in the actual finished performance. 

Qur'an recitation might not be music, but it is a performance. Maybe other people have different opinions, but the fact that it opens up dialogue with God cannot make this, or any related act of performance, anything other than sacred. It's not an "oxymoron." Performance can be sacred, and this is the perfect example. Even if artwork/performance is an entirely human construct (which is an argument you could make for why, then, it's profane, because it's of the mortal world and could therefore be imperfect), there are counterarguments stating that we're all reflections of God and so we do what God does, or what God wants. I think performance is multifaceted and an entirely beautiful, fulfilling method of interacting with the sacred. 

Comments

  1. Jonathan Brumberg-KrausMarch 29, 2022 at 7:43 AM

    You're preaching to the choir here. Of course artistic performance can be and often is an embodiment of "the sacred"! Indeed it's precisely the synthesis or even symbiosis of the interpreter's performance and the human or other-than-human subject of their interpretation that embodies the connectedness to the world that to me is fundamentally a sacred experience.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The most primitive sense

By -
Image
Smell the Flowers by Kirsten Star Smell, to me, is the most primitive sense. When most mammals are born, they immediately can recognize their mother’s smell and form an attachment to that smell. Mammals like puppies are almost entirely limited to only the sense of smell until they develop more of their other senses. The sense of smell also becomes the most primitive when considering humans and the phenomenon of perfume. For years, humans hunted certain animals for the purpose of obtaining the musk produced in the anal gland. This musk in small doses can act as an aphrodisiac when put into a perfume even though it has incredibly primitive origins. Though most of Western culture has an aversion to smells considered gross or undesirable, the wealthiest of women are still willing to pay heavy prices to spray a smell once obtained from the anal glands of other animals. The sense of smell is not something that humans can control and adjust but rather it is only changed by evolution over
Read more

Cannibalism and Symbolism

By -
Symbolism plays an important role in religious ceremonies because people cannot have the divine being where they want him all the time. So they start creating ways to be in touch with God. Such as in Christianity, eating bread is symbolized to be eating God-made flesh. There are similar rituals in Judaism where they eat the food of God. A big difference between taste and the other senses is that the object that is being sensed is internalized, whereas all the other senses use an external sensation. Taste cannot extend anywhere like the other senses can. This allows the humans to have no barrier between the divine (symbolized as food) and themselves. This is the closest they can get to God, but internalizing Him.  This thought of getting the closest they can to someone by ingesting and gaining power from it led my mind to wander to the thought of serial killers that also happen to be cannibals. I know that it might be a stretch, but there are some similarities. I als
Read more

Wrap-Up Post

By -
Image
Alright, let’s tie this up in a nice little bow. I genuinely did not know what to expect coming into this class. The extent of my knowledge of the senses comes from elementary school when we had to make it a little song to get the information through our tiny heads. Beyond that, everything seemed pretty cut and dry. We have five senses. We need to use all of them to survive. It’s as simple as that. I did not know how there was enough to talk about the senses to fill an entire college course, especially one specifically regarding the relationship between the senses and religion. But the fact that we were barely able to fit all the content in before the semester ended proves just how wrong I was. Let’s talk about why that is and what some of the things I learned were. First off, even the most basic assumption about the senses, that there are five of them, was questioned immediately. The sixth sense may not have been as clearly defined as the other senses, but there was certainly a lot to
Read more