Taste, Mortality Salience, and the Toad

By -

Running commentary again.

Not related to the text at all, unless it comes up later: Cooking is an act of playing god. On the other hand, eating and drinking can be seen as giving back: while hardly the most reverent example, Dungeons & Dragons has two excellent examples of this (I know, I know, nerdy as hell, but you gotta stick with what you know): gnolls (hyena-like humanoids) and troglodytes (reptilian humanoids) both worship their patron deities (Yeenoghu and Laogzed, who is pictured, respectively) simply by eating: “When his followers digested food, he would siphon a portion of it into himself, allowing him to feed from those who worshiped him… making simply eating a ritual” (Laogzed). Pretty neat, and depending on how you view it, us humans do the same thing. Except our food is normally both dead and cooked when we start eating, but hey, different strokes for different folks.

Speaking of, taste in religion is weirdly subjective. Humans tend to say the love of the divine is sweet, because we have an evolutionary preference that sweet = good. The wrath of god is a bitter harvest, and while this metaphor is breaking down a touch and I’m definitely making shit up here, we have a craving for suffering in religion (sometimes our own suffering, but mostly the suffering of someone on our behalf) because blood and tears have the salt we crave, too. Ok, wasn’t expecting to see a recipe for still-living roast goose, but hey, just proves my point: suffering can be desirable as long as it isn’t us. And, again, the human obsession with death and suffering: why not eat something that could kill you? Why not choose to ignore the fact that some peppers and spices are actually toxic, and relish the flavor of something that’s supposed to have made you dead by now? We’re at the top of the food chain, like Ackerman says, but “we don’t seem to have gotten used to [it]” (171). (As an aside, Laogzed himself is actually rather horror-movieish, looking back at it: gross, slimy, around 10 feet tall and 12 feet long, and basically just a mindless beast that would even eat its own followers if given a chance (who apparently loves swallowing his prey whole so he can feel it wriggling in his stomach while he digests it, as if he wasn’t foul enough already)). 

And, like I said in my last post, taste is tied as the most intimate sense, because you can’t exactly do it on accident: you need to seek it out, or accept it when it seeks you out, because otherwise it’ll never happen, or it won’t happen in a way that’s pleasant. With communion or a sacred meal, or even (going back to D&D) just dedicating the meal to whatever you call god, it’s intimate. It’s necessary to eat to survive, but you can live by making the food you eat enjoyable, especially when you share the meal with the divine.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The most primitive sense

By -
Image
Smell the Flowers by Kirsten Star Smell, to me, is the most primitive sense. When most mammals are born, they immediately can recognize their mother’s smell and form an attachment to that smell. Mammals like puppies are almost entirely limited to only the sense of smell until they develop more of their other senses. The sense of smell also becomes the most primitive when considering humans and the phenomenon of perfume. For years, humans hunted certain animals for the purpose of obtaining the musk produced in the anal gland. This musk in small doses can act as an aphrodisiac when put into a perfume even though it has incredibly primitive origins. Though most of Western culture has an aversion to smells considered gross or undesirable, the wealthiest of women are still willing to pay heavy prices to spray a smell once obtained from the anal glands of other animals. The sense of smell is not something that humans can control and adjust but rather it is only changed by evolution over
Read more

Cannibalism and Symbolism

By -
Symbolism plays an important role in religious ceremonies because people cannot have the divine being where they want him all the time. So they start creating ways to be in touch with God. Such as in Christianity, eating bread is symbolized to be eating God-made flesh. There are similar rituals in Judaism where they eat the food of God. A big difference between taste and the other senses is that the object that is being sensed is internalized, whereas all the other senses use an external sensation. Taste cannot extend anywhere like the other senses can. This allows the humans to have no barrier between the divine (symbolized as food) and themselves. This is the closest they can get to God, but internalizing Him.  This thought of getting the closest they can to someone by ingesting and gaining power from it led my mind to wander to the thought of serial killers that also happen to be cannibals. I know that it might be a stretch, but there are some similarities. I als
Read more

Wrap-Up Post

By -
Image
Alright, let’s tie this up in a nice little bow. I genuinely did not know what to expect coming into this class. The extent of my knowledge of the senses comes from elementary school when we had to make it a little song to get the information through our tiny heads. Beyond that, everything seemed pretty cut and dry. We have five senses. We need to use all of them to survive. It’s as simple as that. I did not know how there was enough to talk about the senses to fill an entire college course, especially one specifically regarding the relationship between the senses and religion. But the fact that we were barely able to fit all the content in before the semester ended proves just how wrong I was. Let’s talk about why that is and what some of the things I learned were. First off, even the most basic assumption about the senses, that there are five of them, was questioned immediately. The sixth sense may not have been as clearly defined as the other senses, but there was certainly a lot to
Read more