Just Let Me Adore You

By -

Image from Dreamstime.com

Reading about darsan reminded me a lot of my experience with Adoration. According to Christian tradition, Adoration is defined as "a​​ sign of devotion to and worship of Jesus Christ who is believed to be present in body, blood, soul, and divinity, under the appearance of the consecrated host, that is, sacramental bread" (wikipedia.org). It was and is difficult for me to understand how a piece of bread (a wafer, really) is supposed to encompass all of this. Additionally, adoration didn’t make me feel great because it is actually pretty awkward. Typically, people sit or pray in silence which can make it hard to think. I still have trouble looking at Jesus on the Cross in church even though I was an altar server because, in my upbringing, this statue was neither defined as a visual tool nor as an embodiment of the divine, so it really never “did” anything for me during mass, and I just looked at the priest. 


The current and common view/thought/reaction among most religious and non-religious Westerners is that Hindu devotion is wonderful because it is so sensory, colorful, interesting, and exciting. I agree. The only pleasant experience I had with Adoration was similar to this: there was strobe lights, music playing, hand-holding, etc, (this was at a religious conference, which I mentioned in an earlier blog post titled “Jesus Camp”). One of the two main attitudes that Hindu worshippers have about the images they use is that these images are merely devices to help focus concentration because without a visible, sensory form, how can God be meditated upon? From experience, I agree that it’s hard to meditate without anything to stare at, or with just a wafer. It’s much easier to meditate when your senses are active, so I now see these idols as a useful tool to the devotee which has changed my connotation of the word. 


Although this new perspective has confused me about what I have been taught, it also makes me happy that I am taking a religion class to expose me to the ways that different religions use sight and senses in their daily experiences.

Comments

  1. Amanda WellsMay 6, 2022 at 6:51 PM

    I agree! I don't have many experiences within the Christian tradition, but a lot of my family follows the tradition so I've been subjected to many awkward graces before dinner. Just standing there, awkwardly in a circle, listening to grandpa drone on about whatever he'd saying and figuring out whether to close my eyes (which everyone else is doing) or just kinda looking somewhere (when everything is awkward) is agonizing. I couldn't imagine trying to do it in a church.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The most primitive sense

By -
Image
Smell the Flowers by Kirsten Star Smell, to me, is the most primitive sense. When most mammals are born, they immediately can recognize their mother’s smell and form an attachment to that smell. Mammals like puppies are almost entirely limited to only the sense of smell until they develop more of their other senses. The sense of smell also becomes the most primitive when considering humans and the phenomenon of perfume. For years, humans hunted certain animals for the purpose of obtaining the musk produced in the anal gland. This musk in small doses can act as an aphrodisiac when put into a perfume even though it has incredibly primitive origins. Though most of Western culture has an aversion to smells considered gross or undesirable, the wealthiest of women are still willing to pay heavy prices to spray a smell once obtained from the anal glands of other animals. The sense of smell is not something that humans can control and adjust but rather it is only changed by evolution over
Read more

Cannibalism and Symbolism

By -
Symbolism plays an important role in religious ceremonies because people cannot have the divine being where they want him all the time. So they start creating ways to be in touch with God. Such as in Christianity, eating bread is symbolized to be eating God-made flesh. There are similar rituals in Judaism where they eat the food of God. A big difference between taste and the other senses is that the object that is being sensed is internalized, whereas all the other senses use an external sensation. Taste cannot extend anywhere like the other senses can. This allows the humans to have no barrier between the divine (symbolized as food) and themselves. This is the closest they can get to God, but internalizing Him.  This thought of getting the closest they can to someone by ingesting and gaining power from it led my mind to wander to the thought of serial killers that also happen to be cannibals. I know that it might be a stretch, but there are some similarities. I als
Read more

Wrap-Up Post

By -
Image
Alright, let’s tie this up in a nice little bow. I genuinely did not know what to expect coming into this class. The extent of my knowledge of the senses comes from elementary school when we had to make it a little song to get the information through our tiny heads. Beyond that, everything seemed pretty cut and dry. We have five senses. We need to use all of them to survive. It’s as simple as that. I did not know how there was enough to talk about the senses to fill an entire college course, especially one specifically regarding the relationship between the senses and religion. But the fact that we were barely able to fit all the content in before the semester ended proves just how wrong I was. Let’s talk about why that is and what some of the things I learned were. First off, even the most basic assumption about the senses, that there are five of them, was questioned immediately. The sixth sense may not have been as clearly defined as the other senses, but there was certainly a lot to
Read more