All You Need Is Touch (and water, and maybe food)

By -

 

  


Comments

  1. Jonathan Brumberg-KrausApril 28, 2022 at 7:09 AM

    Mary-Jane Rubenstein, in her book Pantheologies: Gods, Worlds, Monsters has one of the best answers I've seen to the question you ask about why touch (and the other "lower" senses) and basically anything related to our materiality, our physicality, our animality is coded as female, especially by the Western intellectual tradition. Of course, you're picking up on the conversation we had yesterday on the last day of our Independent study. Touch I think is so powerful, and in a sense, the most sensual of the senses (as it were) because it's the most _connecting_ of the senses. The senses are all about connecting us to our natural environment and all those who inhabit it, and vice versa. But folks like Plato want to disconnect us from the material world to the "purer", more "perfect" world of pure intellect, ideas. But women, through their obvious role in gestation and birth, implicate us in more deeply in this material world of mere appearances - that Plato and his ilk are trying so hard to extricate us from. But males, who can engage in sex with one another without producing more human offspring, are thus "better", potentially less implicated and implicating in this material world. So yes, blame patriarchy, but a very particular sort of patriarchy, one that despises bodies, especially those capable of producing other bodies. As if males had no role in that process. Mary-Jane Rubenstein shows how and why pantheism is so threatening to this worldview, because it suggests we are all the same MATERIAL, and that material is divine, God. There is no world, no God separate from the material world in which we're embedded. Note the philological connection between mater (mother) and material!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Liv GregoryApril 28, 2022 at 7:39 AM

    I feel that the motherly touch that you described before is large contributor to our relation with "touch" to femininity. Our first feeling and experience with touch and taste is related to our mother straight from birth. Clearly motherly affection through touch is a crucial part of our development I feel that it affects the way we interact with the world through the rest of our life. I would like to think that because mothers are considered our creators and first sensory experiences, as well as the earth which we consider a mother as well is the reasoning behind our association with touch as feminine, but I feel like it's more likely that it started that way, and then the patriarchy ran with it in a sexual direction. Ew.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Liv GregoryApril 28, 2022 at 7:43 AM

    Also after more thoroughly reading JBK's comment it makes sense to me that the certain type of patriarchy that hates bodies would be responsible for this because they clearly only see touch, and skin to skin contact as a sexual thing for whatever reason from their past with touch and the physical world.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Justice

By -
Image
We know the five major senses- touch, taste, sight, smell, and hearing- and we know that there are many senses beyond those ones we tend to limit ourselves to- like your sense of pain or temperature. But how many other senses are there?  Which one is our sixth sense? In The Deepest Sense , I was most fascinated by the chapter on animals. Because they had a good example for what I believe is the sixth sense that ties society together. That is, one's sense of justice. Justice is something that you perceive, and it is something that is perceived by the rest of nature, or at least our closer relatives in the animal kingdom. In that experiment, one of the monkeys was upset by the injustice of the other monkey getting better treatment. This is the cornerstone of every great society- the distributing proper treatment of people and the earth. When there is great inequality, people rise up, because they sense that justice has failed them. Sure, sensing ghosts is probably the most wel...
Read more

Naming Scents: The Ambiguous Nature of Describing Smell

By Samantha K -
Image
It is really difficult to name smells without just saying the thing that produces a smell. We don’t really have words for smells specifically. A floral scent is called that because it smells like flowers, “floral” is not its own word specifically for the scent. This becomes especially apparent when reading the names of candles and perfumes. For example, I own a perfume named “Velvet Moon”. That name has nothing to do with what it smells like, and yet I personally think it is aptly named. The perfume smells like cardamom, mahogany, beeswax, and black pepper. Is that what the moon or velvet smells like? Almost certainly not. But the words used to describe the scent have given me the association between those scents, velvet, and the moon. This is also true when the name of a scent doesn’t match what mid tells you something should smell like. There is a Yankee candle called “By the Pool” that is amber and coconut scented. That notably is not what pools smell like, so while the scent itself...
Read more

Animals and The Sixth Sense

By -
Image
Bandit   In Spell of the Sensuous , Abram writes: “In indigenous, oral cultures, nature itself is articulate; it speaks. The human voice in an oral culture is always to some extent participant with the voices of wolves, wind, and waves— participant, that is, with the encompassing discourse of an animate earth. There is no element of the landscape that is definitively void of expressive resonance and power.” (75) Being around animals for a long period of time really taught me the truth of this idea. Animals develop their own language (and I don’t use that term lightly). They are capable of lying or misleading you, which suggests that they can tell when someone knows them well. They can recognize people as members of their flock just as readily as other sheep or goats. The line between humans and other animals is much more permeable than we might imagine.  Lady At twelve, I began volunteering at a farm. It was situated on two hundred acres of forests and pastures. I worked in t...
Read more