The Woman. Its not always her fault.

By -
The image of the woman in the Proverb “the seductress” is a highly negative depiction of a woman, “She is utterly open to the lover, inviting him and encouraging him to commit adultery with her… she not only breaks the commandants… she perverts them by using the sacrifice of her well-being as a part of her seduction.” (99) This image of a woman implies that she desires ensures that she sleeps with any man who comes near her, especially if she is already married. The negative promiscuous woman depicted in the proverbs and supported by some of the rabbis, heavily contracts with the biological evidence that Dr. Herz discussed in class regarding women and their choice of men.  She explained that, for women, the smell of a man is particularly important, no matter how aesthetically pleasing he maybe, if the woman does not find his smell appealing, she loses interest in him. This demonstrates that ‘biologically speaking’ women are the choosy ones; they are not wandering the streets making themselves available and irresistible to any man that comes by. This description of women back at a time before biology was well understood left a multitude of doors open for sexism and an excuse for men to control and dominate them.

Some of our modern stereotypes of men and women show the opposite situation that is described in the Bible and Proverb. Young attractive men are often stereotyped as ‘a player’, ‘the man’ or ‘a douchebag’ for sleeping with many women. Douchebag is the only offensive term out of these three, the other two are generally taken with pride or admiration from other men. This is where the ideals at the time of Bible and Proverb contrast fiercely with our ideals today. This promiscuous behavior of men is completely acceptable.Cologne commercials are just one example of media encouraging men to seek the attraction of many women. 
(This video has almost the exact same story-line as the description Green discussed. Women luring men with their smell, becoming completely irresistible. However, it differs slightly in that the men were not described as being completely naked and seductive themselves.)

Even when a woman gets hurt, it is often she who is blamed for involving herself in the first place, where it be her use of perfume, clothing or behavior.  Somewhere in history, this behavior became acceptable for men but is still much less acceptable for women a woman is still seen as perverted seductress or “dirty” and immodest if ever she eludes a desire for sex. Which means that not all of our modern culture has changed to contrast with the ideas from the Bible; the perfectly acceptable promiscuous behavior of men today is still blamed on women as it was back in ancient times.

Clearly time has yet to change the image of women... 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The most primitive sense

By -
Image
Smell the Flowers by Kirsten Star Smell, to me, is the most primitive sense. When most mammals are born, they immediately can recognize their mother’s smell and form an attachment to that smell. Mammals like puppies are almost entirely limited to only the sense of smell until they develop more of their other senses. The sense of smell also becomes the most primitive when considering humans and the phenomenon of perfume. For years, humans hunted certain animals for the purpose of obtaining the musk produced in the anal gland. This musk in small doses can act as an aphrodisiac when put into a perfume even though it has incredibly primitive origins. Though most of Western culture has an aversion to smells considered gross or undesirable, the wealthiest of women are still willing to pay heavy prices to spray a smell once obtained from the anal glands of other animals. The sense of smell is not something that humans can control and adjust but rather it is only changed by evolution over
Read more

Cannibalism and Symbolism

By -
Symbolism plays an important role in religious ceremonies because people cannot have the divine being where they want him all the time. So they start creating ways to be in touch with God. Such as in Christianity, eating bread is symbolized to be eating God-made flesh. There are similar rituals in Judaism where they eat the food of God. A big difference between taste and the other senses is that the object that is being sensed is internalized, whereas all the other senses use an external sensation. Taste cannot extend anywhere like the other senses can. This allows the humans to have no barrier between the divine (symbolized as food) and themselves. This is the closest they can get to God, but internalizing Him.  This thought of getting the closest they can to someone by ingesting and gaining power from it led my mind to wander to the thought of serial killers that also happen to be cannibals. I know that it might be a stretch, but there are some similarities. I als
Read more

Wrap-Up Post

By -
Image
Alright, let’s tie this up in a nice little bow. I genuinely did not know what to expect coming into this class. The extent of my knowledge of the senses comes from elementary school when we had to make it a little song to get the information through our tiny heads. Beyond that, everything seemed pretty cut and dry. We have five senses. We need to use all of them to survive. It’s as simple as that. I did not know how there was enough to talk about the senses to fill an entire college course, especially one specifically regarding the relationship between the senses and religion. But the fact that we were barely able to fit all the content in before the semester ended proves just how wrong I was. Let’s talk about why that is and what some of the things I learned were. First off, even the most basic assumption about the senses, that there are five of them, was questioned immediately. The sixth sense may not have been as clearly defined as the other senses, but there was certainly a lot to
Read more